A Blog by

Why Do Luna Moths Have Such Absurdly Long Tails?

You don’t need a field guide to recognise a luna moth. This large insect, found throughout the eastern half of North America, is unmistakeable. It has a fuzzy white body, red legs, feathery yellow antennae, and huge lime-green wings that can stretch up to 4.5 inches across. And at the end of its hindwings are a pair of long, streaming tails that can double the moth’s length.

In 1903, an entomologist named Archibald Weeks suggested that the tails direct predators away from the moth’s body. “Again and again may predator bat or bird, in an effort to capture a moth or butterfly, successively tear away sections of the tails, of which a sacrifice can be readily afforded, without disabling it or retarding its flight,” he wrote.

He was roughly right. More than a century on, Jesse Barber from Boise State University has shown that the luna moth’s tails are the equivalent of eyespots on fish and butterflies. These distinctive markings are typically found on dispensable body parts like tails and outer wings. They serve to draw a predator’s attention away from more vulnerable regions; better to lose a tail than a head.

Eyespots are visual defences, and bats—the main nemeses of moths—are not visual hunters. They find their prey with sonar—they make high-pitched squeaks and visualise the world using the rebounding echoes. To divert a bat, you need something that makes distracting echoes.

That, according to Barber, is what the luna moth’s tails do. They are “auditory deflectors”. Bat distractors.

Luna moth close-up. By Oliver Dodd. CC-BY-2.0
Luna moth close-up. By Oliver Dodd. CC-BY-2.0

Barber pitted luna moths against bats in a dark room, and filmed their encounters with infrared cameras. Under normal circumstances, the bats only managed to snag 35 percent of the moths. But if Barber cut off the insects’ tails beforehand, the bats caught 81 percent of them. That’s not because they become worse fliers—in fact, the tails don’t seem to affect their aerial abilities at all.

When bats aim their sonar at insects, they analyse the rebounding echoes for the distinctive signatures of beating wings. But the luna moths tails, which spin behind them as they fly, also produce echoes that resemble wingbeats. To the bat, they either sound like a very conspicuous part of their target, or like a different target entirely. As a result, they fumble their attacks.

When bats attack, they usually use their wings and tail to scoop an insect towards their faces, so they can deliver a killing bite to their victim’s body. But when bats attack luna moths, they aim about half their attacks at the tails. That’s a mistake—only 4 percent of those attacks succeed. Sometimes, the bat misses the moth entirely (see above). Other times, it bites off a tail while the moth escapes—down one inessential body part, and still alive (see below).

The tails also make the luna moths bigger, which might make them harder for the bats to handle and dispatch. But when Barber pitted bats against the polyphemus moth—an even bigger species that lacks tails—he saw that the predators killed 66 percent of their targets. The luna moths, despite being smaller, were harder to catch. “Clearly, tails provide an anti-bat advantage beyond increased size alone,” Barber wrote.

It’s possible that female moths also judge the health and quality of a male by looking at the size of his tails. But this doesn’t fit with the moths’ behaviour. Female moths spend most of their time hiding in protected nests and drawing males to them by releasing pheromones. They also mate with the first males they find, so there’s no evidence that they’re choosy—much less that they choose on the basis of tail length.

Luna moths belong to a group of large moths called the saturniids—a group that contains members like Copiopteryx and Eudaimonia, with even more extreme tails. By comparing the tail lengths of 113 saturniid species, Barber showed that these moths have evolved long tails on at least four separate occasions. He now wants to know if these other species are also good at foiling bats.

Reference: Barber, Leavell, Keener, Breinhoff, Chadwell, McClure, Hill & Kawahara. 2015. Moth tails divert bat attack: Evolution of acoustic deflection. PNAS http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421926112

10 thoughts on “Why Do Luna Moths Have Such Absurdly Long Tails?

  1. Excellent fit for a freshman biology class that’s just examining natural selection and beneficial adaptations. Here’s a direct test of the feature in question. Very nice. I am reminded of the bird-beak damage on museum specimens of hairstreak butterflies. Birds are apparently fooled by little wiggling tails. Now we see, bats, too. Remember Fabre’s famous speculation about the male antennae possibly being a mark of distinction? That was before we knew about pheromones. By mating with the first males to approach, the female Luna is selecting for effective antennae, not tails.

  2. I took a picture of a Luna moth when I lived in Louisiana. It was the first time I ever saw a moth that big before. I didn’t the moth was called a Luna moth until this article. Thank you for this article it was very interesting.

  3. Very cool. This, along with several other recent studies, really shows that it is now time to explore beyond the visual part of sensory world.
    What is surprising to me in this study is that females don’t seem to prefer males w/ long tails, since if the trait is heritable, their sons should have better chances of survival. In addition, if females behave differently than do males (spending less time in flying outside,) their tails should not be as long as males’.

  4. I enjoyed this luna moth article. I am in 6th grade. I am currently doing a science project on luna moths. Why do luna moths not have mouth parts? Thank you for your help.

  5. My husband and I just camped at Woodford State Park in VT and were lucky enough to have a Luna moth land on a sheet that we had tacked up to the lean-to that we used. The luna moth stayed on the sheet for a day and a half. It was a beautiful sight. We did take pictures if there is a place to post them.

  6. David George Haskell’s blog, called Ramble, today (about Luna moths) linked your blog. If you’re as cool and talented as DGH, and it appears that you are from my first visits to your blog, then you’re another amazing scientist who helps us less-than-amazing normal folk understand and appreciate nature. Thanks in advance.

  7. I want to see more evidence about the flying ability not changing. I saw a tropical moth with really long tails (~6″). The tails sort of hooked together and I have never seen a moth or butterfly go so fast.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *