A Blog by

The Scary, Synthetic, and All-Too-Secret Ingredients of Dietary Supplements

Pieter Cohen, an internist in Massachusetts, got interested in dietary supplements several years ago, when some of his patients came to see him with unexplained — and serious — symptoms. Some went to the hospital with chest pain, or even kidney failure. Others lost their jobs because of positive drug tests. Eventually, after getting them to open up, Cohen realized they all had something in common: They were taking weight-loss pills and other dietary supplements.

An estimated 85,000 supplement products are sold in stores and online. Most of these are vitamins and minerals which, though unlikely to offer real health benefits, are fairly harmless. The supplement industry — which rakes in some $32 billion a year from American consumers — claims that the vast majority of supplements are safe. But that’s really an impossible claim, because most supplements don’t go through any kind of rigorous scientific scrutiny.

Unlike prescription drugs, dietary supplements do not have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they’re sold. That means that the public typically finds out about a product’s risks thanks to anecdotal reports from patients and doctors like Cohen.

Cohen’s experience with his patients spurred him to investigate the ingredients in a range of supplements. What he and others have found is alarming, particularly because about two-thirds of American adults say they’ve tried supplements, and half use them regularly. Most people think of supplements as “natural” ingredients found in plants. But it turns out that a lot of supplements — 560 products identified so far — are tainted with synthetic pharmaceutical compounds, including stimulants, steroids and antidepressants.

For example, last year Cohen published a study showing that a workout supplement called Craze — then sold in GMC stores, as well as Walmart’s website and Amazon — contained a synthetic stimulant called N,α-DEPEA that is a chemical cousin of methamphetamine. Yes, meth. The drug wasn’t in small quantities, either; Cohen’s group found between 21 and 35 milligrams per serving. (The bottle’s label said that the chemical was a natural product of the dendrobium orchid, a claim that, given Cohen’s findings, is almost certainly false.)

Cohen says that he told the FDA about the Craze findings six months before he published the paper. “They did nothing, zero,” he says. “I was really frustrated by the lack of action.”

After the paper came out (and after USA Today published an expose on the criminal past of the founder of Craze’s manufacturer, Driven Sports), the company announced that it had stopped production of Craze. Many months later, in April, the FDA finally sent a warning letter to Driven Sports.

By that time Cohen had heard that the company had replaced Craze with a new product, called Frenzy, sold outside of the U.S. He purchased some of it online and found an ingredient on the label that he had never seen before: “AMP citrate”. After digging into it a bit more, Cohen’s group found that more than a dozen supplements contained this ingredient — also known as 4-amino-2-methylpentane citrate, 1,3- dimethylbutylamine citrate, 4-amino-2-pentanamine, and 4-AMP. Frenzy and one other supplement described the chemical as an extract of Pouchong tea, another dubious claim.

In a study published last month, Cohen’s team performed a chemical analysis of 14 supplements containing this ingredient. The scientists found that 12 of them contained 1, 3-dimethylbutylamine (DMBA). DMBA is chemically similar to DMAA, a stimulant designed by Eli Lilly decades ago as a competitor to amphetamine. In 2006 DMAA started showing up in supplements, and by 2010 it was bringing in $100 million in annual sales. But the FDA banned DMAA last year, after it had been linked to dozens of health problems and five deaths.

Cohen informed the FDA about his new DMBA findings, but isn’t optimistic that they’ll take action anytime soon.

It may be, as industry groups argue, that these unfortunate events are the result of a few bad apples — shady companies that don’t represent the industry as a whole. The thing is, because the industry gets so little oversight, there’s no way to know that for sure. In fact, even when dangerous products are pulled from the shelves, they often reappear on the market later with the same scary ingredients.

A couple of weeks ago, Cohen and his collaborators published a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association looking at 27 supplements that the FDA had formally recalled and were still being sold by their manufacturers under exactly the same name. The scientists bought the products long (8-52 months) after they had been recalled. Eighteen of the supplements contained a “pharmaceutical adulterant”, the study found, and 17 of those contained the same tainted drug that the FDA had warned them about before.

“What we’re talking about here is experimental pharmaceuticals—designer drugs — that have entered the mainstream supplement market,” Cohen says. “The FDA hasn’t caught up with the seriousness of this as a public health issue.”

If you’re taking a supplement and have noticed unusual health problems, you can report them on the FDA’s MedWatch site. Until the agency changes its stance, I think the best advice for supplement consumers is “buyer beware.”

10 thoughts on “The Scary, Synthetic, and All-Too-Secret Ingredients of Dietary Supplements

  1. The routing of designer drugs into supplements is little different from routing them into e-cigarettes or into herbal blends. There is a crass, amoral greed at the root of it all. In my lifetime, I have seen an incredible transformation in how society views personal wealth. In my youth, it was generally frowned upon, and normal people “looked down on money.” This meant that simply accumulating wealth was viewed as somewhat slothful, and those who did so weren’t as respectable as those who obtained lesser amounts of money through hard honest work. This transitioned to the era of lotto winners and slip-and-fall litigants, where it no longer mattered HOW one accumulated wealth – just that you did so. Persons selling toxic supplements and designer drugs to their fellow human beings represent the extreme extrapolation of this ethic. Wealth is now such an overriding objective that one may actively poison unsuspecting consumers…and with a clear conscience, because after all, you gettin’ pape’d UP.

  2. This article said DMAA was linked to 5 deaths. This is simply not true. There was no true examination for two of them and the the final detailed army report found no link to the deaths of the other 3 (soldiers) taking the supplement. Just because someone is taking a supplement and dies while execising in the heat doesn’t automatically denote causality. This is why we have forensic pathologists. http://www.armytimes.com/article/20130806/BENEFITS06/308060035/

    1. The FDA actually has quite a bit of regulatory power under it’s belt currently. They just choose not to exercise it because they are underfunded. I don’t think overreaching legislation is the answer here. Americans simply don’t wanna pay enough taxes to make fair govt work

  3. The regulation of Dietary Supplements have been in place for 7 years now, but as with any law(s), it must be enforced for their to be consequences. This is happening with increased frequency by the FTC and FDA year over year and will continue for some time to come. This “regulatory risk” as we call it is entirely aside from what we advise our clients is also out there with greater frequency, the “legal risk” in getting caught up in a civil or class-action suit for matters relating to the adulteration such as those cited in the article, or more specifically the quality and compliance issues, of their operations/products that lead to consumers getting sick/hurt. The current draft guidance for New Dietary Ingredients, which is likely to become rule in the very near future will be that next step to curb the inclusion of “new compounds” whether derived from natural sources or otherwise, in Dietary Supplements by companies attempting to be first to market or gain some competitive edge without doing the hard work of making products that are GMP Compliant. In short, once that draft guidance on NDI’s becomes law, just remember the four “N’s” – if the ingredient is New and Not Notified, it is Not allowed!

  4. Unfortunately, it’s not just supplements. Food additives are treated the same way. If they feed it to mice and they don’t immediately drop dead, it’s declared GRAS and approved for use in food. There’s solid evidence to support certain additives, such as food colorings and artificial flavorings, having neurological effects on children, including depressing and hyperactivity. But they’ve already been declared safe, so no action is taken. Many of these are petroleum by-products. It’s cheaper to dump it into manufactured foods than to pay to have it disposed of safely.

  5. I WONDER IF THEIR IS A DOCTOR OUT THERE THAT POST WHAT BODY BUILDING PRODUCTS TO AVOID AND WHICH ONES TO TAKE BY CUTTING DOWN ON PUBLIC PUNIC AND EDUCATE NEW BODY BUILDERS IN WHAT IT IS SAFE AND IN WHAT AMOUNTS…ANY LAW SUITS ABOUT FRADULENT COMPANIES ALSO WELCOME…THANKS FOR NOT JUST THE ARTICLE BUT ALSO THE COMMENTS OF OTHERS….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *