National Geographic

Crawling Through The Brain Without Getting Lost

Ampulex compressa. Photo by K. Seltmann, via Creative Commons. Link: http://www.morphbank.net/?id=102143

Ampulex compressa. Photo by K. Seltmann, via Creative Commons. Link: http://www.morphbank.net/?id=102143

If you’ve never met the emerald jewel wasp, let me introduce you to my little friend.

The wasp (Ampulex compressa) lives the first stage of its life as a parasite, growing inside the body of a living cockroach. That’s absorbingly horrific on its own, but how it gets into the cockroach in the first place is an especially gruesome delight. Its mother has to play neurosurgeon.

A female wasp seeks out a cockroach host and ambushes it. She inserts her stinger into its thorax and delivers a paralyzing shot of venom that immobilizes the insect for a few minutes. She pulls her stinger out and then delivers a second injection. This one goes into the cockroach’s head, delivering more chemicals to two sites in the brain of the host.

Image copyright Quade Paul

Image copyright Quade Paul

The result is a cockroach zombie. The neurosurgically altered victim recovers from its paralysis but now lacks the will to flee or fight. The wasp pulls on an antenna and leads the roach, like a dog on a leash, into a burrow. There she glues an egg to the underside of the roach. She leaves the burrow and seals it shut. In the darkness, the roach stands motionless as the wasp larva hatches from its egg and chews a hole into its side. The wasp feeds through the hole for a while, and then slithers inside. Later, it pops out as a full-grown adult.

ampulex emerging

Image by Ram Gal

At Ben-Gurion University, Frederic Libersat and his colleagues have been studying the emerald jewel wasp for over 20 years, and they continue to learn new things about it. In the journal PLOS One, they’ve now published previously unknown details about the creepiest part of the wasp’s attack: its injection of zombie drugs into the cockroach brain.

To appreciate just how tricky this can be, consider what it takes for doctors to deliver drugs to a human brain. They scan the patient’s brain to map its anatomy in three dimensions. Then they put their patient’s head in a cage, drill a hole in the skull, and then slowly push a tube into the brain. A wasp does much the same thing in about a minute, without ever glancing at a brain scan of its victim.

Some days I wish I was a  jewel wasp. Photo source: http://neurosurgerycns.wordpress.com

Some days I wish I was a jewel wasp. Photo source: http://neurosurgerycns.wordpress.com

They pull off this feat with their extraordinary stinger. It measures 2 millimeters long, enabling the wasp to insert it into the roach’s neck and snake it up to the brain. The tip of the stinger has two sets of valves. One set hold the equipment for laying eggs, and the other set hold the equipment for delivering venom. The valves interlock in a tongue-and-groove arrangement so that they can slide over each other, allowing the wasp to lay an egg or deliver a sting with the same organ.

Portion of a wasp stinger. Red arrows mark touch-senstive bell-shaped bumps. Black arrows mark touch- and chemical-sensitive dome-shaped bumps. Gal et al PLOS One. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0089683

Portion of a wasp stinger. Red arrows mark touch-senstive bell-shaped bumps. Black arrows mark touch- and chemical-sensitive dome-shaped bumps. Gal et al PLOS One.

The stinger, the scientists also found, are studded with little bumps–some shaped like bells, others like domes. Each bell-shaped bump has a touch-sensitive nerve ending inside it, while the dome-shaped bumps have a touch-sensitive nerve ending along with four or five chemical-sensing ones.

To see what those bumps are doing, the scientists put electrodes inside the nervous system of wasps and then pushed the stinger against rubbery lumps meant to simulate a roach’s brain. The wasps’s nerves crackled with activity when the bumps on the stinger tip pushed along a lump. This response suggests that the wasp uses its stinger to feel its way through the roach’s brain.

To see if this was true, the scientists stripped the stinger bumps off of wasps and then let them attack a cockroach. The average time the wasps spent probing the cockroach brain shot up from just over a minute to nearly 20 minutes. That’s what you’d expect if the wasps suddenly were unable to find their way inside a cockroach brain.

The scientists then ran another type of test, presenting healthy wasps with roaches that they had altered in various ways. They took the brains out of some roaches and left them with hollow heads. In other cases, they swapped the brain with a rubbery lump (some lumps were hard and others soft). In still other cases, they injected a toxin into the brains of the cockroaches that silenced their neurons. And in still other cases, they insert scissors into the roaches’ heads and snipped up the brains into a homogenous mush.

The scientists found that some–but not all–of these altered roaches posed a challenge to the wasps. If a wasp stung a roach without a brain, she spent over ten minutes probing its head. A soft rubbery lump also stretched out the time the wasps stung their hosts. And after that long struggle, the wasps withdrew their stinger in defeat, without delivering their zombie venom.

But when the wasps encountered a hard rubbery lump–a lump with the same texture as a brain–they spent just a minute poking the cockroach, after which the scientists found venom in the victim’s head.

Nor did the scientists find any change when the wasps were presented with roaches whose brains had been silenced–suggesting that the wasps don’t sense electrical activity to guide their stinger. On the other hand, a shredded brain left the wasps groping. That result suggests that the wasps need to do more than just feel the roach brain–they need to feel different parts of the brain in order to get where they need to go.

Taken together, these results offer a picture of an exquisitely evolved sensory organ–one adapted not for some all-purpose perception, but solely to navigate the interior of a cockroach’s brain by sense of touch. The full magnificence of this sensory organ may yet to be revealed, however. In their new study, Libersat and his colleagues didn’t determine what the chemical-sensing dome-shaped bumps are for.

Do the wasps taste their way through a cockroach brain? It’s possible–but perhaps the dome bumps provide it with other kinds of information. The scientists speculate that the dome bumps may taste the wasp’s own venom as it’s released into the roach’s brain, so that the parasite can carefully control how much she delivers to her victim (this is neuropharmacology, after all). Or perhaps the wasp can taste the flavor of larva of other species of parasites–in which case she may abandon the already-infected cockroach for a fresh host.

If someone answers that question, I guarantee to let you know. In the meantime, here is a video of a talk I gave for TED-Ed in 2012 about the jewel wasp. And if that’s just not enough for you, check out my book Parasite Rex.

There are 21 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. NewEnglandBob
    February 27, 2014

    Can we try the wasps on Republican brains? I suspect they are all shredded. :)

    [CZ: Gratuitous, not funny.]

  2. David Bump
    February 27, 2014

    Thanks for illustrating how nasty Republican-haters are. Do we really need this sort of comment here?

    [CZ: No, we don't.]

  3. Matt Devereux
    February 27, 2014

    Gruesomely fascinating stuff. Parasitic wasps have got to be the creepiest, yet most interesting group of insects out there — correct me if I’m wrong, though.

  4. pengertian ideologi
    February 28, 2014

    my little friend

  5. Sherry Austin
    February 28, 2014

    Beautiful, peaceful nature. Such a comfort. “I think I shall go live with the animals,” wrote Walt Whitman, “they are so placid and self-contained.”

    “Fearfully and wonderfully made.” Indeed! :)

  6. Mike Lewinski
    February 28, 2014

    Darwin described his dilemma trying to square biological knowledge with Christian faith:

    “I cannot persuade myself that a beneficent and omnipotent God would have designedly created the Ichneumonidae with the express intention of their feeding within the living bodies of Caterpillars…”

    Theologically, God’s authority exists because He is the author. So it doesn’t work to say “this wasp is Satan’s doing”, since that takes away some of God’s authority as consequence. You also can’t say “well God created the process of evolution but didn’t specify forms” without diminishing God’s authorship/authority (and raising the problem of how we’re created in His image if he didn’t specify forms).

    I really like the treatment of historical/social/theological dimensions in Parasite Rex. I periodically share the excerpt you provide because it describes some of other theological challenges that science creates:

    http://carlzimmer.com/books/parasiterex/excerpt.html

  7. Penelope Winkler
    February 28, 2014

    I never thought I would feel so sorry for cockroaches.

  8. Ernest Barker
    February 28, 2014

    Evolution is amazing. I wounder about the evolution process that evolved this behavior in this wasp.

  9. Kenny Reeves
    February 28, 2014

    There’s something I’ve been wondering about ever since I read one of your previous posts on the emerald jewel wasp:

    Given that the wasp larva is eating the cockroach and the cockroach isn’t eating anything at all, how long does the roach survive?

    And how long after it dies does the larval wasp reach maturity?

  10. James
    February 28, 2014

    Okay, okay, great article.. but you had me at “Cockroach Command Center”.

    Priceless.

  11. Peter
    February 28, 2014

    So !
    Are we really the top creature on the planet, or are we really at the bottom and just to stupid to know it

  12. Kyler Davis
    February 28, 2014

    Thats amazing! i think that we could advance our medical technology to make it easier to do insert chemicals into the brain. dont you guys think thats possible?

  13. Trevor
    March 1, 2014

    Carl, Can you see the incongruity of criticizing NewEnglandBob’s comment yet praising David Bump’s comment?
    “Can we try the wasps on Republican brains?” and “Thanks for illustrating how nasty Republican-haters are.”
    They are the same, just from opposing points of view.
    The trouble with forums is that people can write anything they want, no matter how abhorrent. My advice is that you. as writer of the article, should not respond to such comments, you lower yourself to their level.

  14. Brian
    March 1, 2014

    This article needs to be read aloud by Vincent Price.

  15. kiran
    March 1, 2014

    I can only say – I find great difficulty in believing this.

  16. Reinaldo Maslim
    March 1, 2014

    Replying to Darwin’s dilemma on Christian faith:

    Gen 3:17-18 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in toil shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;

    It had been written that after man had fallen to sin, God let thorns and thistles to grow on earth. This also applies to animals and nature. We see natural disasters, carnivores as well as this particular jewel wasp behavior. The earth did not function as what God planned it had to be. He let nature to behave this way and let man to suffer from this.

  17. sebasian
    March 2, 2014

    0____0
    O___________________________________________________O

    DEEEEEEEEEEEERP

  18. Gennadyi
    March 3, 2014

    This makes me think how far we’ve come in exploring living organisms from Fabre’s (fascinating and) clumsy attempts to mimic parasitic wasp stings with poison tipped needles to a)being able to analyze regions of a stinger and b)alter them for experimentation.

  19. Scott
    March 4, 2014

    Darwin may have been a great scientist but theologian, not so much. All of God’s creation lived together in perfect harmony until Eve & Adam sinned and that produced a number of permanent consequences. One of which is that God cursed the ground (Earth). Gen. 3:17
    It was not the intention of God to have animals eat each other but man’s free will (God given) was exploited by Satan through our sin. God will correct all of this one day. Isaiah 11:6-7; 65:25.
    And no He didn’t make a mistake, He is in control of everything (sovereign). It is all part of the plan. Doesn’t make sense? He’s God and we’re not. It is beyond our ability. Isaiah 55:8-9 & Romans 11:33-36 for starters.
    That wasp is programmed (instinct) by the Master Programmer. Awesome!!

  20. Mike Lewinski
    March 8, 2014

    It’s likely that Darwin was better educated about Christian theology than most believers today, and he studied Latin and Classical Greek as a prelude to seminary life (I also studied Latin and Greek, and for the latter the New Testament was our primary source material, even though I attended a public university).

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin%27s_education#Natural_theology_and_geology

    The operative words in his quote are “a beneficent and omnipotent God”. Man may have fallen in Genesis, but how does punishing the caterpillar punish man?

    Would a beneficent God cause an innocent being to suffer for our sins? No, that’s malevolent.

    Would an omnipotent God punish humans and cause the caterpillar to suffer by accident? No, that’s not omnipotent.

    So we’re left with a few possibilities. Maybe God is not beneficent, or not omnipotent. Or maybe there is no God at all. I personally find the last most satisfying. Natural selection, operating with no design or direction, has caused this anatomy and behavior in wasps. Natural selection is amoral, concerned not with good or evil, but with survival and reproduction.

  21. Sashy
    March 20, 2014

    Eeeeewwwww gross. Yukkk

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts