National Geographic

Return of the supersoldier ants

One massive group of ants has a secret supersoldier programme that’s been locked away for 35 to 60 million years.

The Pheidole ants are an exceptionally diverse group with over 1,100 species. They’re also known as big-headed ants because their soldier caste has unusually large heads. Until now, we knew that a few of the Pheidole – just 8 out of 1,100 – can also produce supersoldiers, which are even larger than normal soldiers and have even more enormous heads. They use their outsized noggins to block their nest entrances against invading army ants.

Now, Ehab Abouheif has found that the supersoldiers are the result of a genetic programme that runs throughout the entire Pheidole dynasty. It’s likely that every single species in the vast group has the hidden ability to make this special caste. In fact, Abouheif managed to induce supersoldiers among species that don’t usually recruit them, with just a dab of hormone.

I wrote about this study for Nature, so head over there to read all the details. It’s a great evolutionary story.

The eight species that regularly make supersoldiers are spread throughout the Pheidole family tree – some evolved in the group’s earliest days, and others are recent additions. If you looked at that, you’d probably think that the supersoldiers evolved independently. That’s only partly true.

Here’s the more likely scenario, given Abouheif’s experiments. The ancestor of all the Pheidole could make supersoldiers, and some of the earliest species to evolve (like Pheidole rhea) kept this ability in its original form. Later, the supersoldier programme was suppressed for whatever reason. The ants stopped making this caste, but they never lost the potential too. The process that produces the supersoldiers is an exaggeration of the one that produces the normal soldiers. It involves the same hormone, so it may have been impossible for the ants to get rid of the supersoldier programme entirely, without losing soldiers completely.

Later, this dormant potential was reactivated in a few select species, like Pheidole obtusospinosa, and the supersoldiers returned. One element that I didn’t have space for in the Nature piece is that these reactivated supersoldiers aren’t quite the same as the originals. Abouheif explains:

“The ancestral potential has been locked in place for 35-60 million years, but when it comes back, it comes back really raw. The supersoldiers in P.obtusospinosa aren’t like the ones in P.rhea. There are differences in their behaviour and the way they’re used. It’s an interesting mix of retention and novelty. In the paper, we emphasise the sameness, but it’s actually a creative force too.”

It also seems the dormant supersoldier programme spontaneously reactivates in Pheidole species from time to time. Indeed, that’s how this study started – Abouheif was studying a familiar species of ants (P.morrisi) when he suddenly found these monstrous soldiers that he had never seen before. From past experiments, we know that Pheidole sometimes produce supersoldiers if they are particularly well-nourished. “When these ancestral potentials are locked in place, there are mutations that release them at low frequencies. When natural selection needs them, it takes hold of it.

Abouheif thinks that these evolutionary throwbacks, or “atavisms”, crop up all the time, and not just in ants. “They are everywhere,” he told me. “These things are totally unappreciated and been viewed slips in the developmental system that don’t go anywhere. They’ve been seen as the Barnum and Bailey of evolution – interesting oddities that don’t mean anything. They just indicate that there are ancestral genes. But I think they are a driving force in evolution. They are happening all the time, at rare frequencies.”

In the case, Abouheif thinks that of atavisms were much easier to spot in Pheidole, not just because the supersoldiers are so physically different, but because ants care for each other. On their own, the supersoldiers might have been forgotten footnotes in evolutionary history. In a colony, they were cared for and, for some species, eventually became a permanent fixture. Abouheif sums it up nicely:

“Ants are like humans in a way. We take care of the less fortunate in our society. As long as these anomalies can be fed, they’ll be taken care of. As long as they occur rarely enough that they have no cost to the efficiency of the colony, they’ll be taken care of. If we were studying a solitary organism, we’d miss this completely. It’s because it’s social that we’re given the chance to find these things. Ants are making what we would see in solitary organisms much more obvious to the researcher.“

Reference: Rajakumar, San Mauro, Dijkstra, Huang, Wheeler, Hiou-Tim, Khila, Cournoyea & Abouheif. 2011. Ancestral Developmental Potential Facilitates Parallel Evolution in Ants. Science

Photo by the awesome Alexander Wild

There are 5 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. Benoit Bruneau
    January 6, 2012

    I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. Really interesting set of pieces (this one and Nature’s).

  2. Alex Wild
    January 6, 2012

    Thanks for reporting so calmly and thoughtfully on this one, Ed. Your pieces are always a pleasure to read!

    This story has potential to get more interesting. Rajakumar et al did not include what Moreau inferred as the sister to the rest of the genus: Pheidole fimbriata. (Presumably because that’s a South American species that’s harder to collect). This species is dimorphic, like most Pheidole, yet the major is enormous. It looks like a supermajor, yet the species lacks a regular major caste.

  3. Michael Habib
    January 6, 2012

    An exciting and wonderful read; thank you Ed.

    Alex: very excited to see you chiming in. I was curious about two items that you might be able to answer: 1) Are the supermajor forms in Pheidole an isometric blow-up of the major caste, or are there additional measurable differences in shape? 2) If there is allometry involved in #1, then are the major caste individuals in Pheidole fimbriata also similar in shape to the supermajor forms in other Pheidole taxa?

  4. Ed Yong
    January 6, 2012

    Alex can answer the allometry question better than I, but I’ll note that there is one more difference between the soldiers and the supersoldiers. The soldiers have a pair of vestigial wing discs (the bits that would normally develop into wings in other insects). They’re just these little nubs on its back. In the supersoldiers, there are two pairs of these and they’re bigger. They’re a bit odd and Abouheif has a hunch that they have some sort of function, but he doesn’t know what. Or they could just be a side effect of the general development programme that builds the supersoldiers.

  5. Michael Habib
    January 6, 2012

    That is an intriguing additional morphological difference. My first inclination would be to expect that the expanded wing discs are a side effect of the developmental changes, as you noted, but if there is a functional impact as Abouheif suspects, then the first that comes to mind is strain alteration in the thorax as a result of heavy reaction forces from carrying/using the hypertrophied head. The test for that effect would actually be highly tractable, and probably a few days work after getting surface scan data. I shall have to go ponder that… Thank you for writing back!

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts