National Geographic

The Best Way to Eavesdrop on Aliens

This is one of three blog posts associated with this week’s episode of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, which addresses life in the universe. Watch it Mondays on the National Geographic Channel.

Though humanity’s origins are humble, our dreams are grand.

It took millennia for our ancestors to leave their watery cradles. But from those primordial ponds, they eventually emerged and pressed their footprints into land. Those footprints would march through the eons, marking an inexorable progression toward the hairy, bipedal, big-brained beings we are today.

In just a fraction of the time it took those quivering creatures to evolve the lungs needed to breathe Earth’s freshly oxygenated air, our empires have risen and fallen, ideas have wrought the deaths of millions and humans have become an interstellar species.

It wasn’t until 1937 that the first powerful FM transmitter was built and began transmissions at a frequency that could fly into outer space. Those early signals, along with the crude chirps of World War II radars, the first moon bounce of 1946, and all of our TV broadcasts have been zooming into the cosmos for many decades, travelling at the speed of light.

“The leading edge of these signals has already washed over thousands of planets of other stars,” says Neil DeGrasse Tyson, in this week’s episode of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey. “What if other worlds are sending their stories into space? Since 1960, we’ve been listening for extraterrestrial radio signals, without hearing so much as a tolling bell. But our search has been sporadic and limited to small parts of the sky. For all we know, we may have just missed an alien signal, looking in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

It’s a plausible and disheartening reality.

My first story for this blog was about the 1960 search Tyson references, called Project Ozma. Conducted at the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia, by my father, Frank Drake, the search targeted just two stars. For three months, those stars refused to be anything but quiet. But scientists didn’t quit – in fact, Project Ozma launched an era of listening to the cosmos. Over the last half-century, more than a hundred such searches for extraterrestrial intelligence have been conducted – and all have been met with that same stubborn silence.

One obvious explanation is that humans are alone, that we are the only species in the galaxy to have slipped the surly bonds of single-celled solitude and begun broadcasting our stories into space.

But it’s much too early to conclude that.  A realistic explanation is that our searches haven’t been good enough. Tyson is right: They’ve been sporadic and limited in scope.

So if aiming the world’s largest single-dish radio telescope at the stars, or harnessing the computer power of a thousand idle PCs isn’t enough, then what is?

“You need to look at many stars, you need to look almost continuously, and you need to cover a large piece of the radio spectrum,” Dad said, when I asked what his ideal, Earth-based SETI search would be. “If you want to build just one system to do this, you have to put it very near the equator. It’s the only way you can look at the whole sky, every day.” (Better still, he says, would be to have two telescopes placed opposite one another along any line through the center of the Earth — you could monitor the entire sky continuously.)

Dad describes his ideal telescope as comprising a square kilometer radio telescope – kind of like the planned Square Kilometer Array – but with many dishes arranged in a single, dense cluster. Positioning the dishes close together is essential for observing the largest possible number of stars at the same time, which is important for SETI searches. “The game is to look at as many stars as possible since we don’t really have a clue as to which are the best candidates,” he says.

But if you’re looking at 1,000 stars at once, I ask, how will you know which star a signal might come from? “We would love to have that problem,” came the wry response. Turns out, by paying close attention to how the signal shifts in frequency as the Earth rotates, you can figure out which is your lucky star.

“The technology to do this actually exists,” Dad says. “It doesn’t require new inventions.”

A giant telescope, parked on Earth’s equator like a shiny badge, staring into the sky day and night? Sounds pretty good. But the challenges are enormous. The good news is, none are insurmountable. The computing power needed to synchronize incoming data and then process those data, plus the costs of electricity, construction, and management – none of that is negligible. Dad’s figured out how to make most of these things work. The bad news is, as always, cost – possibly as much as $20 billion.

In this age where the U.S. government is nickel-and-diming programs and struggling to scrape together even a tenth of that number for a single solar system mission, $20 billion is enormous. But this is also an age where a 10-year-old Internet company paid $19 billion for an instant-messaging app. For roughly the same price, we could instant-message the cosmos.

How long would it take for such a telescope to find a signal? That’s another question Dad gets a lot, apparently. “You have to make two guesses,” he says. “One is the answer to the Drake Equation [which estimates the number of detectable civilizations in our galaxy], and the other is, how often do they actually send a message our way? There’s no logic I know of that can answer that second thing.”

It could be days, it could be weeks, it could be never.

Whether Earth is the only fertile planet is a question I grew up thinking about, surrounded by replicas of the Pioneer plaque and instruments meant to bring the stars the closer to Earth.

Surely there’s another species out there that has clawed its way from oozing, primordial murk and evolved through eons of uncertainty and shifting skies and become aware of the questions posed by the stars. Perhaps these are the same beings that are now decoding the transmissions from Earth that are streaming across the light-years.

“I am sure they are out there,” dad says.

There are 9 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. Anarcissie
    May 19, 2014

    Inadequate search procedures and technologies are one solution to the Fermi Paradox. However, I feel a different solution is more likely: they are there, and maybe here, and just don’t care to talk to us. Given the irrationality, irascibility, aggressiveness, and violence of the species, I would be pretty careful about starting a conversation with any humans.

  2. Sachi Mohanty
    May 19, 2014

    There IS not a question out there that is more important than the one that SETI concerns itself with.

    Strange that so few humans find such questions fascinating.

    Humans are “SIMULTANEOUSLY” so intellectually and technologically advanced and yet so intellectually backward too — unable to let go of silly passions such as religion and nationalism.

    So much human energy is wasted in fighting needless and man-made troubles.

    And yet there are millions of stars out there and then millions of galaxies out there waiting for humans to “grow up” and start exploring.

    Where will our species be a MILLION years from now?

    Sometimes I wish I had been born in the far future.

    When, hopefully, humans would have outgrown some of their silly provincial and parochial concerns and prejudices.

  3. Chris K.
    May 20, 2014

    Sachi, I so agree!! I say the same thing to friends & family and usually get looked at like I’m crazy. I feel like all I see is crazy people wasting their time.

  4. Billy T
    May 21, 2014

    From paragraph one, “In just a fraction of the time it took those quivering creatures to evolve the lungs needed to breathe Earth’s freshly oxygenated air, our empires have risen and fallen, ideas have wrought the deaths of millions and humans have become an interstellar species.” Did I miss the part where humans have become ‘interstellar’? When did we travel between starts, or even to our own star the sun? Don’t get me wrong, I think humans are great and all, but interstellar? Really?

    • Nadia Drake
      May 21, 2014

      Well, I guess it depends on how you define the term. We definitely haven’t physically left the solar system, and we won’t do that any time soon. But if you consider that our spacecraft (such as the Voyagers) are zooming ever farther from the sun, and our broadcasts — traveling at the speed of light — have washed over stars and planets tens of light-years away, then I think it’s fair to say that humans have an interstellar footprint.

  5. CNURC
    May 21, 2014

    Who’s to say that ETs use or used the same technology we did? SETI looks for radio waves only. But I guess we have to start somewhere. Kepler has helped to at least give us a few options as to where to point the telescopes.
    ETs are our there. UFOs are real.

  6. LizR
    May 22, 2014

    The answer to the Fermi paradox may just be (a) it’s very rare for human-intelligence species to evolve in an ecological system – there are lots of demerits to large brains, and the merits only become apparent after the relatively long time required to invent language and so on – and (b) technologically advanced species may tend to self destruct for various reasons.

    The human race has been broadcasting radio signals into space for around 100 years. Unless we do something fairly soon to prevent ourselves from succumbing to various catastrophes, we may only manage another 100, then go silent forever. Two centuries is a cosmic eyeblink, and the chances of two civilisations blinking into existence at the exact same time, and managing to get in touch, is fairly negligible.

    If human civilisation self destructs in wars over increasingly scarce resources, or ruins most of its farmland through topsoil erosion and sealevel rise, or does any of the other things that are on the horizon, then we won’t rise again, because we’ve already used up all the readily available resources the first time around. A second industrial revolution won’t find any easily available oil, because we’ve burned it all, and without that kickstart, we’re unlikely to get far out of the middle ages again, ever. And one day a comet will turn up with our number on it, and it will be game over, because we didn’t get out of Earth’s gravity well and colonise the solar system during our one short window of opportunity.

    Technological civilisations that remain confined to one world may blink in and out of existence like mayflies, and just never coincide. A similar civilisation to ours on the opposite side of our galaxy would have to have been broadcasting exactly 60,000 years ago for us to now notice them. If they went silent after 2 centuries, then the chance are we’d never detect them, because if they were broadcasting before 59,900 or after 61,000 years ago, we would miss them…

    The history of life may last billennia on any given world, but without technology there will be no interstellar communication. And if technology only rises briefly before falling, the chances of one happening to lie inside a 200 light year thick “radio wave shell” broadcast by another one, given the size of the universe or even the galaxy, is minute.

    I hope the above isn’t true, but I fear it is.

  7. Robert Dylan
    May 22, 2014

    Great post & comments. State funding (USSR) got us into space first. State funding (US) got us to the moon. Now that private capital is in the driving seat, space travel will be for profit & not man’s benefit. If aliens exist / are here, is it likely they are here for profit – as we would be?

  8. Sarah
    May 29, 2014

    I study astrophysics at university. I am not an expert on the subject but I think we may already have been influenced by more advanced civilizations like from the indigenous people in america and kukulkan (think about that for a while). We may have missed an alien signal in forms of radio transmissions. But think about the spectra that could be shared at a distance and quantum levels. The brain share these neural connections with it all. Maybe we have been missing telepathic alien signals and just ignoring them.

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts