Sail-Backed Dimetrodon Had a Nasty Bite

Dimetrodon had a mouth full of novelty. Most conspicuous were several different tooth types in the sail-backed protomammal’s jaws – incisor-like teeth for gripping, stabbing canines, recurved rear teeth for shearing through flesh, and even hidden teeth on the roof of the mouth to pin struggling prey. This combination of features, shared by other members of the sphenacodontid group to which Dimetrodon belonged, originated with such predators as they thrived between 298 and 272 million years ago. And particular species of Dimetrodon even added a new wrinkle to the enamel-based armaments. As described by University of Toronto Mississauga paleontologists Kirstin Brink and Robert Reisz in a new Nature Communications paper, Dimetrodon is the earliest known land-stalking carnivore to have bitten through flesh with serrated teeth.

At a glance, the skulls of Dimetrodon look quite similar. Their main difference is in size. But the teeth of Dimetrodon are a different story. Details in enamel and dentine, Brink and Reisz report, distinguish three different kinds of cutting edges that distinguish smooth-toothed biters from those capable of a saw-edged chomp.

An evolutionary tree showing the evolution of tooth serrations in Dimetrodon. From Brink and Reisz, 2014.
An evolutionary tree showing the evolution of tooth serrations in Dimetrodon. From Brink and Reisz, 2014.

The oldest and smallest species in the study, Dimetrodon milleri, had teeth with straight cutting edges. Sharp, sure, but not especially well-suited to cutting through skin and muscle. By the time of the later, larger Dimetrodon limbatus, though, these carnivores had evolved small serrations in the enamel along the cutting edges of some of the teeth. The teeth of Dimetrodon grandis were even more specialized for cutting. Teeth in this last and largest species of Dimetrodon had prominent denticles along the slicing surface  that created a serrated edge similar to that of predatory dinosaurs. Dimetrodon just happened to evolve “ziphodont” teeth about 40 million years earlier.

While the three species of Dimetrodon in the study don’t represent a direct evolutionary line, the connection between true serrated teeth and larger body size hint at an ancient arms race between competing predators and their prey.

The skull of Dimetrodon with a close-up of a section of the tooth serrations. Courtesy Kirstin Brink.
The skull of Dimetrodon with a close-up of a section of the tooth serrations. Art by Danielle Dufault, courtesy Kirstin Brink.

Dimetrodon wasn’t the only predator around in the Early Permian. Other sphenacodontids, some with very similar skull anatomy, were after the same pool of protomammals, reptiles, and amphibians. This could have driven Dimetrodon to take up a different diet, Brink and Reisz hypothesize, and the changes to their teeth and body size hint that these distant cousins of ours were targeting larger prey with tough hides.

Big, serrate-toothed Dimetrodon evolved at a time when their herbivorous victims were also becoming larger. Barrel-bodied, pin-headed protomammals called caseids proliferated during this time, Brink and Reisz point out, and the sail-backed edaphosaurids, as well as amphibians called diadectids, also underwent an increase in body size. Damaged bones show that Dimetrodon weren’t above eating their own kind, either, and so it’s possible that the serrated teeth of species such as Dimetrodon grandis gave these carnivores the literal edge they needed to expand their menu options.

Study authors Kirstin Brink and Robert Reisz with a Dimetrodon skull. Photo courtesy Kirstin Brink.
Study authors Kirstin Brink and Robert Reisz with a Dimetrodon skull. Photo courtesy Kirstin Brink.

For now, though, the connections between body size, serrated teeth, competition, and prey availability remain murky. Brink and Reisz stress that further testing and investigation is needed to understand this new aspect of a familiar, but still mysterious relative of ours. From tooth to sail, we’re still getting to know Dimetrodon.

Reference:

Brink, R., Resiz, D. 2014. Hidden dental diversity in the oldest terrestrial apex predator Dimetrodon. Nature Communications. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4269

13 thoughts on “Sail-Backed Dimetrodon Had a Nasty Bite

  1. Brian, you might want to spell Dr. Reisz’s name correctly in the reference. BTW serrated teeth on Dimetrodon is old news, known for decades. Also caseids are closer to millerettids, not protomammals. And diadectids are not amphibians but procolophonid precursors.

  2. Interesting that different species assigned to the same “genus” differ in such an important feature!

    Re: Caseids as “protomammals”– I take it that Brian is using this term as generic for non-mammalian Synapsids: critters more closely related to mammals than to dinosaurs. In referring the Caseids to this lineage, Brian is following what is still the majority view among palaeontologists. I am aware that David peters has proposed a radical, revolutionary, rearrangement of the family tree, but his view has not (yet?) been generally accepted.

    1. “Acceptance” is politics my friend. The beauty of Science is you can see and do and repeat the experiment or observation for yourself.

  3. @DavidPeters Precisely! That is the beauty of science. When an idea is disproved it is discarded *cough Pterosaurs as lizards *cough. if only all researchers followed that advice.

  4. “Science is you can see and do and repeat the experiment”…. So long as you have access to a proprietary image analysis technique which has never been released to scientists at large.

  5. Authors initials in the paper citation should be “Brink, K.S., and Reisz, R.R.”

    Dave Peters pareidolic interpretations of vertebrate morphology are what one might charitably call “flights of fancy.” A short article showing why his methods are not trustworthy can be found here:

    http://bigcat.fhsu.edu/biology/cbennett/Bennett-PT-article.pdf

    …and a longer detailed deconstruction can be found here:

    http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/2012/07/03/world-must-ignore-reptileevolution-com/

  6. Interesting paper on synapsids here from 2008 that includes a survey of serration density in basal synapsids:

    A RE-EVALUATION OF SPHENACODONTID SYNAPSID MATERIAL FROM THE LOWER PERMIAN FISSURE FILLS NEAR RICHARDS SPUR, OKLAHOMA
    DAVID C. EVANS†, HILLARY C. MADDIN‡, ROBERT R. REISZ
    Article first published online: 31 DEC 2008
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00837.x

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00837.x/pdf

    It seems clear to me that ziphodonty in Dimetrodon and other basal synapsids isn’t news in an of itself.

  7. Wonder who would have a better adaptability or endurance. Gorgonopsid or Dimetrodon. I know that Gorgonopsid is Dimetrodon’s decendent but…

  8. I just want to say how cool it is to study dinosaurs. I’m in 9th grade and I just love see and learning about dinosaurs, I have one question though, what was the longest and biggest speacies of Dimetrodon ever?

  9. I am very impressed with your treatment of the subject of pharyngeal teeth in Dimetrodon. Many workers overlook this interesting feature. I was so impressed that I linked your article to my blog (at Paleo & Geo Topics).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *