When an existing genetic condition is chosen by the environment also fits with the high altitude “mutation”.

And if you have too much hemoglobin at low altitudes it is called a disease. That disease can cause blood clots and blood pressure issues.

I only show people the obvious that cannot be denied.

I’ve read every article on so called evolution of bacteria and guess what, it does not evolve. It mutates to survive by learning how to digest new foods. Bacteria is well known to “learn” to digest any carbon based foods that are digestible.

The entire study done by Linski on e-coli does not show any form of evolution. The bacteria remains as bacteria.

In order to show evolution in the sense of the original definition that I learned in school, you must show advancements in complexity that equate to new cells forming with new functions.

Bacteria has no indication whatsoever that it evolves.
It does show that it is programmed to learn to digest whatever foods it is forced to “eat”.

In the bacterium Nylonase it did this in a few as 9 generations. (Nylon is made mostly of Carbon. Carbon is not synthetic.)

It made a duplicate gene. (how did is chose that gene in such a short time by “random”?)
It took the new gene and performed a frame shift mutation on it. Then it put in new start and stop codons in 9 generations.

By the theory of evolution this is impossible. There is nothing about this that “spells random” mutation. It is very definite programming to do this.
The odds of it choosing that gene to duplicate is beyond the 1 in trillons. That it made a frame shift and KNEW to keep the original gene proteins functioning so it could live off the “old foods” while it learned to eat the new nylon shows extreme designed in intelligence. There is no other plausibility.
Then the odds of it frame shifting that new gene segment until it aligned with the new “food” is pure amazing designed in programming.
Now try to tell me the odds of that as well as the odds of it choosing by random the new start and stop codons.

Evolution believers are amazing that they miss the obvious because they are not allowed to see it.

By the rules of “evolution” it takes millions of years for something like that to take place. Yet bacteria does this all the time when forced to adapt. But it never changes into some new creature with new cells.

[CZ: Well, here we have an exemplary case of someone not only ignoring the comment policy of the Loom (see here and here, which are linked in the right-hand column), but also ignoring a specific instruction to stop using the blog as a manifesto and find a relevant comment to make about this post on viruses. This is totally unacceptable. This behavior kills conversation. So we're done.

All right–I’m done now with this digression.]

It is the incidents that determine the degree of our genetic degradation.

According to WHO 30.4 million people die each year from genetic diseases. In ten years we kill far more people by our ignorance of life and how destructive and genetically suicidal we are.

There are 7000 rare genetic diseases and 1 in 10 people have them.

I have thousands of statistics from all over the earth.

The one that is also startling is that for the first time in 50 years, the last 6 years shows an increase in infant mortality in EVERY COUNTRY that reports.

The truth is not for those who cannot deal with it. If you can’t deal with this, then what can you deal with?

The number of people suffering from genetic heart disease is 1 in 15 who need surgery. It is 1 in 8 for those with cardio-vascular diseases.

The tebetan mutation cannot be traced to it’s origin. It may just be another remnant that is going extinct like the 1A milano.
This is because 50,000 mutation and the nature of how mutations work does not allow for magic.
The 1 A Milano is NOT being selected and proves there is no positive selection.

People want to beleive in magic. It is a human emotional weakness. It is far better for most emotional people to “hope”, even in with the amazing amounts of data that show we are degrading faster than ever.

Check out Crabtree’s article on people getting dumber and that 3000 years ago we reached the peak of intelligence according to DNA data. He’s a geneticist from Stanford University.

[CZ: No, the study I pointed you to shows that the Tibetan mutation experienced natural selection. It became more common because it benefited people who inherited it. But you don't even have to look at humans. You can look at E. coli in a laboratory, adapting to conditions created by scientists. Scientists can sequence their entire genomes and see precisely which mutations lead to a beneficial new trait. At this point, this discussion has veered to far from the subject of the blog post: viruses with CRISPR systems. Please leave relevant comments.]

[CZ: Actually, according to the National Cancer Institute, "The Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2009, shows overall cancer death rates continued to decline in the United States among both men and women, among all major racial and ethnic groups, and for all of the most common cancer sites, including lung, colon and rectum, female breast, and prostate." Source: http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/newsfromnci/2013/ReportNation Also, you clearly didn't bother to read the paper I pointed you to about beneficial mutations in Tibetans. So you're demonstrating that you are both wrong AND indifferent to evidence.]

Over to you CZ.

medical sciecne states clearly that the average human would no live past 30 to 40 years today without medical aid.
We are in a really bad genetic condition and getting worse by on average 3 deleterious mutations per generation found so far.
Each human has over 1000 deleterious mutations right now.
The truth is not for the weak minded.

[CZ: Where to begin? Where to end? The chimpanzees are edging towards extinction due to hunting and destruction of their habitat, not due to some kind of degeneration through mutation. I have no idea why you consider 1A Milano the only viable mutation. Here, for example, is a paper on Tibetan adaptation to high altitudes. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895075/ It's free. If you're going to try to list "fact" in favor of your case, I'll expect links to scientific literature as well.]