<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:media="http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poposaurus, Postosuchus, and the Dinosaur Mimic Croc Walk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/</link>
	<description>A science salon hosted by National Geographic Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:41:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peters</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41513</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it about Poposaurus and poposaurids that make paleontologists think they were croc relatives? The calcaneal tuber? The large reptile tree at reptile evolution.com recovers poposaurids as phytodinosaurs with a convergent  development of a calcaneal tuber, the only dinosaurs to do so. This is convergent with crocs themselves, which also developed a calcaneal tuber after basal crocs, like Gracilisuchus and Scleromochlus, did not have one. One trait, even an ankle trait, does not trump the suite. It&#039;s time to add more pertinent taxa and rerun the analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it about Poposaurus and poposaurids that make paleontologists think they were croc relatives? The calcaneal tuber? The large reptile tree at reptile evolution.com recovers poposaurids as phytodinosaurs with a convergent  development of a calcaneal tuber, the only dinosaurs to do so. This is convergent with crocs themselves, which also developed a calcaneal tuber after basal crocs, like Gracilisuchus and Scleromochlus, did not have one. One trait, even an ankle trait, does not trump the suite. It&#8217;s time to add more pertinent taxa and rerun the analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cai Yuan</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41408</link>
		<dc:creator>Cai Yuan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Rauisuchidae&quot; in scare-quotes is justified by its probable inclusion of Teratosaurus, however, giving Teratosauridae Cope 1871 priority.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rauisuchidae&#8221; in scare-quotes is justified by its probable inclusion of Teratosaurus, however, giving Teratosauridae Cope 1871 priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuzzy Logic</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41199</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuzzy Logic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that even though life on earth in this day and age is very refined, back in the prehistoric times is where i&#039;d like to be. The lush trees, the inviting forest. Creatures of exceptional ability such as this. It makes you wonder what could have been, dosen&#039;t it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that even though life on earth in this day and age is very refined, back in the prehistoric times is where i&#8217;d like to be. The lush trees, the inviting forest. Creatures of exceptional ability such as this. It makes you wonder what could have been, dosen&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41195</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh my god they are graet and cool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh my god they are graet and cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DWalker</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41103</link>
		<dc:creator>DWalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine the first prehistoric findings...they all seemed weird and several nary seemed possible. Impressive data shows that biped creatures were not only a possibility but a reality. Weinbaum is brilliant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine the first prehistoric findings&#8230;they all seemed weird and several nary seemed possible. Impressive data shows that biped creatures were not only a possibility but a reality. Weinbaum is brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41097</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got it! Thanks, 220!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it! Thanks, 220!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 220mya</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41095</link>
		<dc:creator>220mya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although in the past &quot;Rauisuchia&quot; and Rauisuchidae have sometimes been used synonymously, Nesbitt (2011) provided a formal phylogenetic definition for Rauisuchidae: The most inclusive clade containing &lt;I&gt;Rauisuchus tiradentes&lt;/I&gt; (Huene, 1942) but not &lt;I&gt;Aetosaurus ferratus&lt;/I&gt; Fraas, 1877, &lt;I&gt;Prestosuchus chiniquensis&lt;/I&gt; Huene, 1942, &lt;I&gt;Poposaurus gracilis&lt;/I&gt; Mehl, 1915, or &lt;I&gt;Crocodylus niloticus&lt;/I&gt; Laurenti, 1768 (sensu Sereno, 2005).

Thus, by definition Rauisuchidae is monophyletic, and recent phylogenetic analyses suggest it includes &lt;I&gt;Rauisuchus, Polonosuchus&lt;/I&gt;, and &lt;I&gt;Postosuchus&lt;/I&gt; spp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although in the past &#8220;Rauisuchia&#8221; and Rauisuchidae have sometimes been used synonymously, Nesbitt (2011) provided a formal phylogenetic definition for Rauisuchidae: The most inclusive clade containing <i>Rauisuchus tiradentes</i> (Huene, 1942) but not <i>Aetosaurus ferratus</i> Fraas, 1877, <i>Prestosuchus chiniquensis</i> Huene, 1942, <i>Poposaurus gracilis</i> Mehl, 1915, or <i>Crocodylus niloticus</i> Laurenti, 1768 (sensu Sereno, 2005).</p>
<p>Thus, by definition Rauisuchidae is monophyletic, and recent phylogenetic analyses suggest it includes <i>Rauisuchus, Polonosuchus</i>, and <i>Postosuchus</i> spp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41066</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Randy. Although I&#039;ve seen rauisuchid in quotes, as in Weinbaum&#039;s paper. The varying usage is sometimes a bit confusing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Randy. Although I&#8217;ve seen rauisuchid in quotes, as in Weinbaum&#8217;s paper. The varying usage is sometimes a bit confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 220mya</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41064</link>
		<dc:creator>220mya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian - there&#039;s no need to use Rauisuchidae or rauisuchid in quotes - that is a monophyletic group.  There terms that require quotes are &quot;Rauisuchia&quot; and &quot;rauisuchian&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian &#8211; there&#8217;s no need to use Rauisuchidae or rauisuchid in quotes &#8211; that is a monophyletic group.  There terms that require quotes are &#8220;Rauisuchia&#8221; and &#8220;rauisuchian&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Nicholls</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/21/poposaurus-postosuchus-and-the-dinosaur-mimic-croc-walk/#comment-41048</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Nicholls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151584#comment-41048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rany Irmis&#039; recent UFOP talk had a great takeaway lesson. Modern crocodilians are not representative of their Triassic forebears, and there are recent fossils that show that crocodylomorphs were even more diverse earlier than previously understood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rany Irmis&#8217; recent UFOP talk had a great takeaway lesson. Modern crocodilians are not representative of their Triassic forebears, and there are recent fossils that show that crocodylomorphs were even more diverse earlier than previously understood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
