Comments on: Q is for Qiaowanlong http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/04/q-is-for-qiaowanlong/ A science salon hosted by National Geographic Magazine Sun, 26 May 2013 01:49:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2-alpha By: Mike Taylor http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/04/q-is-for-qiaowanlong/#comment-39712 Mike Taylor Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:33:08 +0000 http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151588#comment-39712 No problem.

I see I got the HTML wrong for the first link in the comment above. Could you please fix it me? Much obliged.

]]> By: Brian Switek http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/04/q-is-for-qiaowanlong/#comment-39711 Brian Switek Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:28:46 +0000 http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151588#comment-39711 Thanks, Mike! I had forgotten about that post, but should have known. I should run a SV-POW! search just to check anytime I cover sauropods.

]]> By: Mike Taylor http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/02/04/q-is-for-qiaowanlong/#comment-39710 Mike Taylor Mon, 04 Feb 2013 21:27:23 +0000 http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=151588#comment-39710 Quick bit of self-promotion …

We covered Qiaowanlong at SV-POW! the day after the paper came out (Bifid Brachiosaurs, Batman!, More on Qiaowanlong already), and correctly called it as not a brachiosaurid.

]]>