<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:media="http://video.search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toxodonts Traveled North</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/</link>
	<description>A science salon hosted by National Geographic Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.2-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefanus Sutopo</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38833</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefanus Sutopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 11:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that the reason why toxodonts and phorusrhacids never make it up north is that they just weren&#039;t adapted for high latitude life from the start (AFAIK, no toxodont or phorusrhacid fossils have been found from South America&#039;s far south; correct me if I&#039;m wrong)

Still, this is still a very big &quot;IF&quot;, and perhaps some of the more established, adult, scientists can enlighten me on this :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the reason why toxodonts and phorusrhacids never make it up north is that they just weren&#8217;t adapted for high latitude life from the start (AFAIK, no toxodont or phorusrhacid fossils have been found from South America&#8217;s far south; correct me if I&#8217;m wrong)</p>
<p>Still, this is still a very big &#8220;IF&#8221;, and perhaps some of the more established, adult, scientists can enlighten me on this <img src='http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38724</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post.
One thing to bear in mind when writing about southern US coastal areas is that what constitutes the coast would have been completely different at the height of the last ice age. For example, a lot of the area between Yucatan and Florida would have been dry.

Therefore the S American beasts found from Texas to Florida would have had a lot more land to roam at that time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.<br />
One thing to bear in mind when writing about southern US coastal areas is that what constitutes the coast would have been completely different at the height of the last ice age. For example, a lot of the area between Yucatan and Florida would have been dry.</p>
<p>Therefore the S American beasts found from Texas to Florida would have had a lot more land to roam at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hai~Ren</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38648</link>
		<dc:creator>Hai~Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the North American porcupine counts as one of the more successful southern species. It seems like most other southern species, such as capybara, terror birds, and other xenarthrans like anteaters, glyptodonts, pampatheres and armadillos did not manage to spread very far north.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the North American porcupine counts as one of the more successful southern species. It seems like most other southern species, such as capybara, terror birds, and other xenarthrans like anteaters, glyptodonts, pampatheres and armadillos did not manage to spread very far north.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the reply! I guess sloths are just weird. The image of Megalonyx in the snowy North is just bizarre. I guess it works the other way as well. Coelodonta never made it over Beringia, while Mammuthus, Cervus, Alces and others did. Without knowledge of the environmental and ecological constraints on the living animals we&#039;ll probably never know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply! I guess sloths are just weird. The image of Megalonyx in the snowy North is just bizarre. I guess it works the other way as well. Coelodonta never made it over Beringia, while Mammuthus, Cervus, Alces and others did. Without knowledge of the environmental and ecological constraints on the living animals we&#8217;ll probably never know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Switek</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38621</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Switek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 19:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great question, Ross! I don&#039;t think any of the South American mammal lineages made it as far as the sloths, although I&#039;m not entirely sure of their entire distribution. It seems that some SA lineages - toxodonts, terror birds - stuck to coastal areas in southern North America. I wonder why that is, and why the sloths were so much more widespread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, Ross! I don&#8217;t think any of the South American mammal lineages made it as far as the sloths, although I&#8217;m not entirely sure of their entire distribution. It seems that some SA lineages &#8211; toxodonts, terror birds &#8211; stuck to coastal areas in southern North America. I wonder why that is, and why the sloths were so much more widespread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/01/14/toxodonts-traveled-north/#comment-38602</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/?p=150390#comment-38602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating stuff. Do any other South American endemics make it further than Megalonyx jeffersoni in Alaska? http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic53-3-213.pdf]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating stuff. Do any other South American endemics make it further than Megalonyx jeffersoni in Alaska? <a href="http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic53-3-213.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic53-3-213.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
