National Geographic

Why are stabby mantis shrimps much slower than punchy ones?

Credit: Professor Roy Caldwell at UC Berkeley.

If you want to find an ocean animal that kills with speed, don’t look to sharks, swordfishes, or barracuda. Instead, try to find a mantis shrimp. These pugilistic relatives of crabs and lobsters attack other animals by rapidly unfurling a pair of arms held under their heads. One group of them—the smashers—have arms that end in heavily reinforced clubs, which can lash out with a top speed of 23 metres per second (50 miles per hour), and hit like a rifle bullet. These powerful hammers can shatter aquarium glass and crab shells alike.

Most research on mantis shrimps focuses on smashers, but these pugilists are in the minority. The majority are “spearers”, whose arms end in a row of fiendish spikes, rather than hard clubs. While the smashers actively search for prey to beat into submission, the spearers are ambush-hunters. They hide in burrows and wait to impale passing victims. They’re Loki to the smashers’ Thor.

Given their differing lifestyles, you might expect the spearers to be faster than the smashers. They rely on quick strikes to kill their prey, and they target fast victims like fish and shrimp rather than the tank-like, slow-moving crabs favoured by smashers. But surprisingly, Maya DeVries from the University of California, Berkeley, found that the fastest spearer strikes at just a quarter of the speed of the fastest smasher.

Working with Sheila Patek, who first properly measured the smashers’ record-breaking punches, DeVries tested two spearers. The first, Alachosquilla vicina, is a small species just 2 to 3 centimetres long. The second, the beautiful zebra-striped Lysiosquillina maculata, is the largest mantis shrimp in the world—DeVries worked with individuals were just 13 to 17 centimetres long, but they can grow to 40. She teased her spearers with frozen shrimps, and filmed them with high-speed cameras as they launched out of their burrows.

The footage revealed that the smaller A.vicina reached a top speed of just 5.7 metres per second, and the bigger L.maculata had a top speed of just 2.3 metres per second. That’s fast for a punch that moves through water, but pathetically slow compared to the 23 metres per second record of a peacock smasher.

The strikes took longer too. The peacock connects with its target in 2.7 milliseconds, while A.vicina takes 3.2 milliseconds, and L.maculata takes 25 milliseconds.

The difference between the two species is surprising in itself: you’d expect the bigger animal to be faster than the small one because of its larger muscles. To understand why L.maculata is slower, you need to understand the anatomy of a mantis shrimp’s arm.

A smasher would never be able to achieve its record-breaking speeds if it simply flicked its arm out like a human boxer. Instead, it first stores up energy. Once its cocks its arm back, a small latch locks the club in place. The animal tenses its large muscles and builds up energy, which is released all at once when the latch lets go. (To see the difference in speed and power, try flicking out your index finger on its’ own, and then hold holding the tip against your thumb first.) There’s also a saddle-shaped structure that compresses like a spring when the arm is cocked. As the latch releases, the spring expands and provides extra push for the speeding club.

Both spearers have the same features, and the small one carries out spring-loaded strikes just like the smashers. But L.maculata doesn’t—it never engages its saddle-shaped spring, and powers its strike entirely by contracting its muscles. Maybe at that size, the spring just doesn’t work very well, or the big muscles provide enough force. But the spearers that DeVries studied were just as big as many of the smashers from previous research—if the latter could engage their springs, the former should be able to as well.

To check that the captured mantis shrimps weren’t just being sluggish, DeVries went out into the field. She spent three weeks swimming around the sandy flats and mangroves of Lizard Island, Australia, filming wild zebra spearers. And she saw the same thing – the wild individuals caught prey with strikes that were just as slow as their captive peers.

Obviously, that’s fast enough to capture fish and shrimp, or the spearers would have starved themselves extinct by now. So perhaps the right question isn’t why the spearers are so unexpectedly slow, but why the smashers are so ridiculously fast?

The traditional assumption is that fast speeds are for capturing fast prey – think falcons and cheetahs. But DeVries suspects that the smashers have extreme punches so generate extreme accelerations and extreme forces. A spearer needs one successful strike to impale its prey. A smasher needs many strikes to cripple its quarry. It doesn’t need speed to deliver a quick punch; it needs speed to deliver a punishing one.

Reference: DeVries, Murphy & Patek. 2012. Strike mechanics of an ambush predator: the spearing mantis shrimp. J Experimental Biology http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.075317

More on mantis shrimps:

There are 6 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. David H.
    November 21, 2012

    Maybe the stabby-shrimp’s prey wear Holtzman generators as personal shields? Fast-moving blades won’t penetrate, but a slower, more practiced attack will gain entry.

  2. J
    November 22, 2012

    Fascinating article, and a fascinating and beautiful group of animals. I have seen them myself many times while diving in Southeast Asia.
    One thing i noticed: in the last para, there seems to be an “s” where there should be a “t”: “extreme punches so generate extreme accelerations”.

  3. MosesZD
    November 22, 2012

    F=MV + leverage. Nature understands these and doesn’t tell itself stories about big, manly muscles.

  4. Thinkyhead
    November 22, 2012

    Nature is conservative, so if fast enough is fast enough then fast enough will do. A secondary consideration would be stealth for these shrimp, so it may be that the stealth of slow stabbing vs ‘loud’ punching reinforces its being slower as well. A lot of subtle pressures in evolution.

  5. Edward Tubb
    November 24, 2012

    This article got me thinking… energy gets stored when you snap your fingers, too. Which begs the question: how fast does a human middle finger get when snapped against the pad of the thumb?

    Well, there’s video here of a finger snap at 2000 frames a second: http://courses.ncssm.edu/hsi/hsvideo/snap.wmv

    It’s not perfect, but the period from the middle finger leaving the thumb to smacking the pad is something in the range of 12 and 20 frames (starts at about frame -10 and ends somewhere between frame 2 and frame 10).

    That’s 12-20 frames over a distance of, say, 5 cm. That works out to 6 – 10 ms over 5 cm, which works out to between 5 and 8 m/sec.

    As a ballpark guess, I’d say that’s not too shabby. The speed of the finger likely peaks a fair bit faster than that. Somebody grab a high speed camera and a ruler!

  6. Sam
    October 22, 2013

    I think it may be an structural issue. The clubbers have shorter stout reinforced clubs that ends in a radius; break your tank strong! The pokers usually like the preying mantis have multiple smaller finer spears that help capture and disable prey due to the larger surface area that they cover. This phalanx of spear points are much weaker and I agree with another commenter in that they are as fast as they need to be. If they were faster a miss or a bad attack angle could cause the shrimp damage to itself by breaking off those pokey things.

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts