Earlier this month, inspired by Daily Mail and HuffPo nonsense, I went on a tear about dinosaur sex. Because if you’re going to rant, why not go big? The post kicked up a good deal of attention, and I was honored to be bestowed with the highly-vaunted title of “the closest thing the Internet has to an expert on dinosaur sex” by Cracked’s Daniel O’Brien.
After that minor internet kerfuffle, I thought I had said my peace on paleo-copulation. Best to let sleeping dinosaurs lie, especially if they’ve just had sex. But after I got back from fieldwork at Dinosaur National Monument and starting riffling through journals for new subjects to write about, I saw a paper I couldn’t resist. The subject, as the title makes clear in its understated way, is “exceptionally well-preserved giant spermatozoa” discovered in prehistoric ostracods. Giant fossilized sperm? Yes, please!
“Ostracod” isn’t a household name. That’s too bad, because there are tens of thousands of species of these tiny, shrimp-like crustaceans. Typically, their segmented bodies are surrounded by a hinged, tough outer shell, and they occupy a variety of niches in both fresh and saltwater habitats the world over. In this case, the ostracod in question is Cypria ophtalmica – a freshwater species that’s still with us today.
The Cypria ophtalmica fossils aren’t very old. In fact, they barely make the cutoff for what counts as prehistoric. Discovered in the Southern Carpathian Mountains of Romania, the invertebrate fossils are only about 14,400 to 10,000 years old. But what makes them remarkable is the fact that Babes-Bolyai University paleontologist Sandra Iepure and colleagues found prehistoric sperm with both male and female ostracods, the “richest” evidence of fossil sperm yet found.
This isn’t the first time paleontologists have found evidence of ancient sperm. Previous studies have found sperm among roughly 5,000 year old ostracods from the UK, spermatophores were preserved in 40 million year old amber with an insect called a springtail, and paleontologists identified the essential seminal and receptacle organs among 100 million year old ostracods discovered in Brazil. I never thought that something as ephemeral as prehistoric sperm could survive for thousands or even millions of years, but, once again, the fossil record has shown me up. The new fossil sperm collection analyzed by Iepure and collaborators adds to the catalog of surprising fossils.
What makes the fossilized sperm so easy to spot is their size. After some fly species, ostracods have the second longest sperm in relation to their body size. As Iepure and co-authors note, some 1 millimeter long ostracods can produce sperm up to a 1 centimeter long, stretching ten times the body length of the ostracod itself. (I only pray that David Cronenberg never learns this fact.) Sadly, Iepure and co-authors don’t provide length estimates for the specimens they describe, but they note that the prehistoric specimens are consistent with what researchers have observed among living ostracods.
Between five and ten percent of the ostracods in the study sample contained sperm, but the individuals within this subset don’t all preserve the gametes in the same way. In most of the specimens, the sperm bundles appear to be neatly arranged in the position expected for the male reproductive organs. In the other specimens, the sperm bunches are located in a different place and are dislocated from each other. Based on observations of living ostracods, Iepure and colleagues propose that individuals with neat arrangements are males and the ones with the messier bundles are inseminated females. This is the first time prehistoric sperm has been found preserved in both sexes.
So we can add a few more amorous ostracods to the growing list of creatures that died just about the time they mated. And, of course, this raises the question of just how far the fossil record of sperm goes. The ostracods in the new study were fortuitously preserved in an environment that kept some of their delicate features intact, and the much older springtail fossil was trapped in amber. The further we go back in time, the less likely it seems that even giant sperm could have been preserved by the typical modes of burial and fossilization, but amber does offer a possible mode of preservation. Perhaps, as they continue to scour amber samples, paleontologists will discover even older prehistoric sperm. Don’t hold your breath for dinosaur semen, though. It would take a hell of a coincidence for dinosaur sperm to somehow wind up locked in amber, survive for over 66 million years, be discovered, and correctly identified by a researcher. For now, we’re left to marvel at the exceptional gametes of the little ostracods.
Reference:
Iepure S, Namiotko T, Valdecasas AG, & Magyari EK (2012). Exceptionally well-preserved giant spermatozoa in male and female specimens of an ostracod Cypria ophtalmica (Crustacea: Ostracoda) from Late Glacial lacustrine sediments of Southern Carpathians, Romania. Die Naturwissenschaften, 99 (7), 587-90 PMID: 22751904
Related Topics
Go Further
Animals
- Octopuses have a lot of secrets. Can you guess 8 of them?
- Animals
- Feature
Octopuses have a lot of secrets. Can you guess 8 of them? - This biologist and her rescue dog help protect bears in the AndesThis biologist and her rescue dog help protect bears in the Andes
- An octopus invited this writer into her tank—and her secret worldAn octopus invited this writer into her tank—and her secret world
- Peace-loving bonobos are more aggressive than we thoughtPeace-loving bonobos are more aggressive than we thought
Environment
- Listen to 30 years of climate change transformed into haunting musicListen to 30 years of climate change transformed into haunting music
- This ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrificeThis ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrifice
- U.S. plans to clean its drinking water. What does that mean?U.S. plans to clean its drinking water. What does that mean?
- Food systems: supporting the triangle of food security, Video Story
- Paid Content
Food systems: supporting the triangle of food security - Will we ever solve the mystery of the Mima mounds?Will we ever solve the mystery of the Mima mounds?
History & Culture
- Strange clues in a Maya temple reveal a fiery political dramaStrange clues in a Maya temple reveal a fiery political drama
- How technology is revealing secrets in these ancient scrollsHow technology is revealing secrets in these ancient scrolls
- Pilgrimages aren’t just spiritual anymore. They’re a workout.Pilgrimages aren’t just spiritual anymore. They’re a workout.
- This ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrificeThis ancient society tried to stop El Niño—with child sacrifice
- This ancient cure was just revived in a lab. Does it work?This ancient cure was just revived in a lab. Does it work?
Science
- The unexpected health benefits of Ozempic and MounjaroThe unexpected health benefits of Ozempic and Mounjaro
- Do you have an inner monologue? Here’s what it reveals about you.Do you have an inner monologue? Here’s what it reveals about you.
- Jupiter’s volcanic moon Io has been erupting for billions of yearsJupiter’s volcanic moon Io has been erupting for billions of years
- This 80-foot-long sea monster was the killer whale of its timeThis 80-foot-long sea monster was the killer whale of its time
Travel
- How to plan an epic summer trip to a national parkHow to plan an epic summer trip to a national park
- This town is the Alps' first European Capital of CultureThis town is the Alps' first European Capital of Culture
- This royal city lies in the shadow of Kuala LumpurThis royal city lies in the shadow of Kuala Lumpur
- This author tells the story of crypto-trading Mongolian nomadsThis author tells the story of crypto-trading Mongolian nomads