Amber trapped dinosaur feathers at different stages in their evolution

This is the first stage. They’re simple, single filaments, found in dense forests and unrecognisable as feathers. They’re different from the hairs of mammals because they don’t have any scales along their length. Nor are tubes from fungi or plants for they lack the thick cell walls that these groups have. They look a lot like the downy “dino-fuzz” that covered Sinosauropterx, the first dinosaur to be found with evidence of feathers. Sinosauropteryx’s fuzz was largely a reddish-brown colour, while those found in the amber ranged from dark to almost transparent.

In the second stage, the filament has turned into a cluster of ‘barbs’. In a modern feather, the barbs branch off from a central stalk or ‘rachis’ but at this stage of feather evolution, the rachis doesn’t exist yet. Instead, the barbs all emerge from a shared base. They’re closest to the fuzz of Sinornithosaurus, another feathered meat-eating dinosaur – possibly venomous, and one of the earliest members of the group that included Velociraptor and Deinonychus.

In stage three, the barbs partially unite to form a central rachis, and even smaller filaments called barbules start to branch off from the barbs. This type of feather is also found in McKellar’s amber and some of them have barbules wit tight coils at their bases. Grebes – modern diving birds – have similar coils in their barbules. When they dive, the coils expand and allow the feathers to absorb water, making the grebe less buoyant and allowing it to sink. It looks like this adaptation was already around in the Cretaceous period.

In the final stages of feather evolution, the barbules develop small hooks, which allowed neighbouring barbs to interlock like strips of Velcro. These hooks turned the feathers into flat vanes, which in turn allowed them to generate lift. These tiny structures helped birds to conquer the air, they’re the ones that cover the bodies of most modern birds, and they too are found in the Cretaceous amber.

Reference: McKellar, Chattertton, Wolfe & Currie. 2011. A Diverse Assemblage of Late Cretaceous Dinosaur and Bird Feathers from Canadian Amber. Science

Images courtesy of Science/AAAS

More on feathered dinosaurs:


There are 11 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. Robert S-R
    September 15, 2011

    Wow. With all the feather fluff that must have been floating in the air, I shouldn’t be surprised that we have these fossils. I wonder if similar fossils have been ignored because someone didn’t, or couldn’t, realize they were looking at dinosaur feathers inside.

  2. Bill Macomber
    September 15, 2011

    The authors make some interesting claims in this paper. Among them are that their “Stage II” amber-preserved filaments are “generally comparable” in size to S. millennii protofeathers.. oddly, S. millennii protofeathers are at least ~1.2 mm while their amber filaments are ~0.2 mm.. i guess in that sense a mouse is “generally comparable” in size to a ferret..

  3. amphiox
    September 16, 2011

    i guess in that sense a mouse is “generally comparable” in size to a ferret..

    When the outlier is an elephant, it is!

  4. Arwen from the Chameleon’s Tongue
    September 16, 2011

    I always think of amber as having insects in it, so it’s cool to hear it has other things like dropped feathers inside. Put together like this they show a nice story.

  5. Giovanni Dall’Olio
    September 16, 2011

    What will be the status of the DNA inside the feathers in the amber? Can we clone a dinosaur now?
    please, can we? :-)

  6. Ed Yong
    September 16, 2011

    I asked Currie that! Sadly:

    “I think it is unlikely in that most of the time, amber preserves high fidelity surface details but not much inside. The biggest problem, however, is that the feathers are still rare enough (and small enough) that it is unlikely that we will even try it without having some assurance of success first.”

  7. Bill Macomber
    September 16, 2011

    When the outlier is an elephant, it is!

    I assume the response is tongue in cheek. they are using size as one of a very few diagnostic characteristics , yet by their standards a bunch of filaments of any of the sizes found in nature would qualify. pretty sloppy.

  8. AG
    September 16, 2011

    Now, it makes sence that dinos were warm blooded and could live near artic.

  9. Bill Gross
    September 21, 2011

    I haven’t read how you’d distinguish these “proto-feathers” from fluffy ferns. I’m sure the pro’s can figure it out, but I haven’t found any good articles explaining the trail of evidence. Anyone know of any, so that I could read more on the subject?

  10. anon
    September 27, 2011

    Finally! We can create Jurassic Park! I hope I can someday to see living dinosaurs

  11. TJ Pittsburgh
    July 24, 2015

    “The difference between S. millennii protofeathers are at least ~1.2 mm while their amber filaments are ~0.2 mm.. i guess in that sense a mouse is ‘generally comparable’ in size to a ferret.”?

    Not exactly. Not to split hairs–or feathers!–but a largish BALB/c mouse (BALB/c) is about 25 g, and a smallish female ferret is about 750 g, or 30X larger. That difference between S. millennii protofeathers and their amber filaments is merely 6X.

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts