A Blog by

Bone holes suggest active dinosaurs

Somewhere on the side of your thigh bone, there is a tiny hole. It’s called a “nutrient foramen”. An artery passes through this gap, suffusing the bone with blood and oxygen. The hole is found in all thigh bones, from those of birds to lizards, and it always fulfils the same function. But it can also double as a keyhole into the past, allowing us to peek at the lives of animals long extinct.

Roger Seymour from the University of Adelaide has used the size of these holes to show that many dinosaurs of all sizes led active lifestyles.

Seymour measured the nutrient foramina in the thigh bones of almost a hundred animals, and found that, in general, bigger animals have bigger bones and bigger holes. But those of mammals are around twice as big as those of similarly sized reptiles. Combined with the fact that mammal blood has a higher pressure than reptile blood and carries more oxygen, Seymour estimates that mammal bones receive around 54 times more oxygen than reptiles ones do.

This all makes sense. When they’re doing exercise, mammals have higher metabolic rates than reptiles and they need more oxygen to fuel their activities, just as a race-car needs different pipes than a Mini, in order to cope with its more powerful engine.

There are two exceptions. Seymour found that in terms of foramen size, monitor lizards clustered with mammals. These lizards are active hunters that can even chase down mammal prey. Thanks to a unique “gulping” style of breathing, monitor lizards have exceptionally high metabolic rates for reptiles, and their thigh bones have unusually large foramina to match.

Seymour also showed that the foramina of 10 dinosaurs, from Centrosaurus to the towering Girraffatitan, were even larger for their size than those of mammals, and much bigger than those of comparable reptiles. Seymour says that these fossilised holes “support the ever-growing evidence that some dinosaurs were highly active animals” that ate a lot, grew quickly, and were capable of intense bursts of activity.

Does this mean that dinosaurs were warm-blooded? Not necessarily – after all, monitor lizards manage to have high metabolisms without generating their own body heat. But certainly, Seymour thinks that each dinosaur in his study led a “routinely highly active and aerobic lifestyle.”

By Seymour’s own admission, this is a “preliminary study”. The species he studied are largely Australian ones, so the trends look slightly different in other parts of the world. The size of the foramina might also be affected by an animal’s evolutionary history, the number of legs it walks upon, or the environment it lives in. Nonetheless, with a bit more data, the size of the foramen could be an easy way of assessing the lifestyle of an animal by doing little more than measuring a hole in its bone.

Reference: Seymour, Smith, White, Henderson & Schwarz-Wings. 2011. Blood flow to long bones indicates activity metabolism in mammals, reptiles and dinosaurs. Proc Roy Soc B http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0968

6 thoughts on “Bone holes suggest active dinosaurs

  1. Seymour estimates that mammal bones receive around 54 times more oxygen than reptiles ones do. This all makes sense. When they’re doing exercise, mammals have higher metabolic rates than reptiles and they need more oxygen to fuel their activities

    To fuel the activities of their femurs?
    It doesn’t make that much sense.
    Or is this supposed to be an index of bloodflow rates more generally?

    Obviously missing but crucially important comparator group: birds.

  2. They left out birds because (i) they generally fly rather than run; (ii) their bones are hollow, which complicates things, and (iii) there’s little data on their maximum metabolic rates.

  3. Remarkably clever method!

    @Sven, the more active an animal is, the more bone rebuilding is necessary. This is particularly critical once animals are running, because of the higher impact forces associated with it. Surprisingly, bone does cost a significant amount, metabolically, to maintain, with regular building and breaking down of the structure, and hard use results in quite a bit of turnover in bone structure. It’s nowhere near the metabolic cost of muscle or neural tissue, but even highly-active neurons only take around 40 times more energy per unit weight than bone.

    I, also, would love to see some data on ratites here. This seems like a paper of its own, though; quite a bit of work, since fossil species would be needed to give any statistical power to the group data.

  4. Isn’t this based on assuming that dino blood is equivalent to reptile blood? We have no way of knowing how efficient their blood is at carrying oxygen. Perhaps the 65 my of evolution has given their descendants better hemoglobin?

  5. as i believe we must assume their blood to reptile blood, otherwhise a lot of researches are useless. But anyway, i agree with your thinking, there is no prove that dino hemoglobin is the same.

  6. Hello,

    I’m always deeply concerned when I see someone using a coordinate system with double logarithmic axes, drawing nice straight lines (sometimes even with correlation coefficients) through data points and then claiming a realationship of some kind.
    The actual errors in the graph at the outer points are much higher than nearer to 0/0. But the human eye (and simple linear regression as well) does not recognize this easily and it thus easily fooled to “see” a correlation which might be there or not.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *