National Geographic

Evolutionary arms race turns ants into babysitters for Alcon blue butterflies

alcon_blue

This is an old article, reposted from the original WordPress incarnation of Not Exactly Rocket Science. I’m travelling around at the moment so the next few weeks will have some classic pieces and a few new ones I prepared earlier.

In the meadows of Europe, colonies of industrious team-workers are being manipulated by a master slacker. The layabout in question is the Alcon blue butterfly (Maculinea alcon) a large and beautiful summer visitor. Its victims are two species of red ants, Myrmica rubra and Myrmica ruginodis.

The Alcon blue is a ‘brood parasite’ – the insect world’s equivalent of the cuckoo. David Nash and European colleagues found that its caterpillars are coated in chemicals that smell very similar to those used by the two species it uses as hosts. To ants, these chemicals are badges of identity and the caterpillars smell so familiar that the ants adopt them and raise them as their own. The more exacting the caterpillar’s chemicals, the higher its chances of being adopted.

The alien larvae are bad news for the colony, for the ants fawn over them at the expense of their own young, which risk starvation. If a small nest takes in even a few caterpillars, it has more than a 50% chance of having no brood of its own. That puts pressure on the ants to fight back and Nash realised that the two species provide a marvellous case study for studying evolutionary arms races.

Theory predicts that if the parasites are common enough, they should be caught in an ongoing battle with their host, evolving to become more sophisticated mimics, while the ants evolve to become more discriminating carers. These insects make a particularly good model for such arms races because their geographical ranges overlap in a fractured mosaic.

Alcon blues lay their eggs on the rare marsh gentian plant and it’s there that they first grow before being adopted by a foraging ant. Both gentians and butterflies are rare but the ants are common, meaning that only a small proportion of colonies are ever parasitized. The result is a series of evolutionary hotspots where the two species wage adaptive war against each other in contrast to the many coldspots where colonies never encounter the deceptive butterflies.

Myrmica_rubra

Nash found evidence of evolutionary hotspots when he looked at one of the butterfly’s host species, M.rubra. The chemical coats of populations that were victimised by Alcon blues were significantly different from each other, while those of uninfected colonies were much the same. Those that had encountered the parasitic moochers were adapting by shifting their own smells to distinguish their own from the caterpillars.

But when Nash looked at the second host species, M.ruginodis, he found no traces of evolutionary arms races. All the populations smelled very similar regardless of whether they were parasitized or not.

The difference lies in the mating patterns of the two ant species. M.rubra queens breed with local males, from colonies in the same gentian patches that are likely to also have a measure of resistance against Alcon blues. M.ruginodis queens disperse more widely and frequently mate with males from distant populations that do not encounter the parasites. Any new mutations for parasite resistance are quickly diluted by the flow of genes from these non-resistant neighbours.

Nash thinks that the butterfly uses M.ruginodis as a back-up host, a safe chump to manipulate when M.rubra evolves a strong enough resistance to its lies. To back this up, he found at least one site where M.rubra populations smelled very different but had no contact with Alcon blues. He thinks that these are populations that won their arms race – they once had to contend with the parasite but adapted so well that it abandoned them as hosts.

Images courtesy of David Nash

Reference: Nash, D.R., Als, T.D., Maile, R., Jones, G.R., Boomsma, J.J. (2008). A Mosaic of Chemical Coevolution in a Large Blue Butterfly. Science, 319(5859), 88-90. DOI: 10.1126/science.1149180

More on evolutionary arms races:

There are 5 Comments. Add Yours.

  1. zackoz
    October 17, 2010

    An Attenborough doco recently screened here in Australia described this pattern, but added a twist where the parasite became victim to another parasite, predictably a wasp.

    The wasp invades the ant’s nest , scattering a pheromone which confuses the defending ants, making them fight each other! It then lays an egg in the butterfly grub, which is tended lovingly by the ants. Eventually, a wasp emerges from the grub’s carcass.

  2. Shade
    October 18, 2010

    zackoz, would you mind providing a link or some thing?
    I am really interested in this.

  3. Brian Schmidt
    October 18, 2010

    Regarding that last M. rubra population, its victory is probably just cyclical. The chemical coat presumably has a fitness cost with no beneficial value now that the butterflies have stopped parasitizing. That M. rubra population will either lose the adaptation or get outcompeted by other conspecifics. and then the cycle starts again.

    We see an arrow in time where the process is possibly much more cyclical. This reminds me of the newt/garter snake competition that Ed posted about several years ago. I’ll try to dig up the link.

  4. Brian Schmidt
    October 18, 2010

    Well, here’s what I wrote on this possibility of being cyclical, with links to two of Ed’s posts:

    http://backseatdriving.blogspot.com/2008/12/connecting-north-american-newts-and.html

  5. zackoz
    October 23, 2010

    sorry to respond so late, Shade, but see above. It’s from Attenborough’s recent “Life” series.

Add Your Comments

All fields required.

Related Posts